10K Friday: Poor Man’s Porsches – 914 v. 924

While I’ve spent a lot of time on 10K Fridays looking for the most car for your money, today we’re going to take a different path and look at the least Porsche for your money. Sound a bit strange? Well, while other Porsche models have taken off in value or are on the verge of being completely unaffordable, it’s refreshing to know you can still get a nice quality Porsche on a budget. Could you get into a beaten 944 Turbo for this money? Yes, and perhaps if you’re looking for a performance car that would be a better choice. But in the true spirit of the creation of both the 914 and 924, I want to look at the most simple versions of both of these cars. Which would be the one for you? Let’s start with the 914:

Year: 1972
Model: 914
Engine: 1.7 liter flat-4
Transmission: 4-speed manual
Mileage: 100,000 mi
Price: $7,500 Buy It Now

CLICK FOR DETAILS: 1972 Porsche 914 on eBay

1972 914 porsche from california new tires fuel injected very rust free for more info call dennis 847 521 9442

I have to admit, I’m a more recent convert to thinking clean 914s are pretty cool. They’re not the most attractive by any measure, but they have a Lotus-like simple design. Think of this car as the Porsche Europa and it makes a little more sense. Pop the top and you’ve got a fun, simple targa design. This model has some upgraded alloys and looks reasonably clean. Miles are lower and the price – $7,500 – wouldn’t get you into much of any other Porsche; that is, except the underdog 924:

The 924 is such a clean and elegant design, it’s nice to see them in their original spec. Sure, they sprouted flares, spoilers and big wheels and became more aggressive but the original design is still impressive. With that engine running well, you’ll be in the mid-30 mpg range cruising in what is still a very aerodynamic design today. In Guards Red over tan, this is a great looker:

Year: 1981
Model: 924
Engine: 2.0 liter inline-4
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Mileage: 29,574 mi
Price: $5,995 Buy It Now

CLICK FOR DETAILS: 1981 Porsche 924 on eBay

Runs and drives very well. The body and paint are in very good condition. The interior is in good shape, but the seats have rips and the dash is cracked. Has a clear title.

Yes, the engine is anemic, and like many of the early 924/944 variants the dash is now cracked. But for a full $1500 less than the 914, this package is really quite neat. Like the Targa roof on the 914? Well, most of the top of the 924 is removable and ultimately the experience isn’t that different. This particular 924 was well equipped and with very low miles seems in great shape! The price is high for a non-2.5 924, but considering the condition it would be a better deal than buying a worse-condition one and trying to restore it. Not many love the 924, but it is pretty amazing that nearly two decades after it’s launch the 968 was still looking fresh with effectively this same design.

Which would I choose? For me, it’s a no-brainer – I’d choose the 924 over the 914 any day. As an affordable classic and entry level car in the Porsche world, it’s still unappreciated and values reflect that, but it’s a clean and neat design that can be owned on a strict budget – not something that can be said of many Porsches!


Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Heh… define “*very* rust free”… :-/

  2. Like choosing between a period VW and a period Audi.

  3. I had a mint 914 2.0 in college, in the mid 80’s, and I would totally own one of these again.
    If I had the space, this time, it would be a 914/6.
    The 924, when new, I remember how the dash would crack two years after purchase, the back hatch would rattle four years later, and the center grille on the dash would bulge out after five years.
    Liking my cars to be absolutely perfect, these things would drive me crazy.

  4. Agreed – the ones to have are the 914-6 and 924 Carrera GT; but neither can be had cleanly for under 10K (and it seems that asks on good 914-6s are now in the 50K plus range!) so they’re out of competition.

  5. I own a 1978 924. I have to say, I have always been a fan of both the 914 and 924. These are very interesting cars that a real person can afford to own and maintain. I love the fact that there are so many interchangeable Volkswagen parts for both of these cars and that there is an analog simplicity to the driving experience which is lacking in today’s cars. The simple elegance of the design of the transaxle cars has always appealed to me though. The original 924 has a clean and uncluttered profile, which inspired the shape of many of the sports cars of the 1980’s. I am amazed at how contemporary my car still looks from an aesthetic standpoint. It is not a race car, however! Performance is modest at best, and is distinctively Volkswagen like. I say, that if you like MK1/MK2 GTI or Scirocco models, you will feel right at home. The 924 has been greatly misunderstood of the years. The 914 had an honest Volkswagen-ness to it, which coupled with its targa-roadster shape was easier to accept for its time. The 924 was much more sophisticated and more expensive and the expectations were so much greater. The 944, 944 turbo, and ultimately the 968 lived up to the perception of what a transaxle porsche should have been at the time. I feel that the 924 was unfairly maligned and that slowly, but surely people are starting to appreciate what it is. The 924 is a simple, affordable, stylish, and pure sports car that still feels special.

  6. Chris, thanks for your great comments and insight – I agree with you completely! Sure, the original 924 isn’t much of a “performance” machine but it sure is a neat small sports coupe!

  7. I’ve been browsing online more than 3 hours today,
    yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as
    you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.

    Here is my site … 品質合格 ジャケット 推薦 (Madonna)

Comments are closed