Where does the 944 Turbo lie in the collector market? That’s a fantastic question. For such a limited model produced over a relatively short span of time, there’s an amazing array of models and changes that occurred over the run that alter the car’s perception, the car’s performance, and – most importantly – the car’s value.
Starting in 1985, the “951” took the idea which had been pioneer with the 924 Turbo and Carrera GT/GTS/GTR and brought it to a much larger audience in a much easier to digest package. Every successive model year saw some changes, from the addition of anti-lock braking in 1987 to the upgraded “S” package in 1988, replete with Cup-inspired Koni suspension and turned-up engine performance for near 250 horsepower. This package carried over, largely unchanged minus the deletion of the S designation, for the entire 1989 model year in the U.S.. Of course, the power, performance and package of the 944 Turbo immediately brings it into comparison with the other two revolutionary small displacement sports cars of the time; the BMW M3 and the Audi Quattro. Each had their own unique character, each has their heavily devoted, mind-can’t-be-changed-that-they-were-the-best-ever fact sheets, and each has their flaws. So how to they stack up in the market today?
CLICK FOR DETAILS: 1989 Porsche 944 Turbo on eBay
Year: 1989
Model: 944 Turbo
Engine: 2.5 liter turbocharged inline-4
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Mileage: 36,067 mi
Price: $33,997 Buy It Now
1989 PORSCHE 944 TURBO
IMMACULATE AND RARE 1989 PORSCHE 944 TURBO!! WAY AHEAD OF ITS TIME!! THIS CAR IS IN UNBELIEVABLY SUPERB CONDITION FOR BEING 27 YEARS OLD!! ALWAYS GARAGE KEPT AND BABIED!! ONLY 36K ORIGINAL MILES!! METICULOUSLY MAINTAINED AND COMES FULLY SERVICED AND DETAILED!! GORGEOUS FACTORY SILVER WHEELS WRAPPED IN BRAND NEW GOODYEAR EAGLE TIRES!! THE BLACK EXTERIOR PAINT IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION AND SHOWS ZERO DENTS!! THE INTERIOR IS STUNNING!! BEAUTIFUL PERFORATED BLACK LEATHER SEATS THAT SHOW LITTLE TO NO WEAR!! NEVER SMOKED IN!! HEATED MIRRORS..POWER FRONT AND REAR SEATS!! REMOVABLE SUNROOF!! OIL PRESSURE GAUGE..VOLT METER..COOLANT TEMP GAUGE..AND BOOST GAUGE!! POWER WINDOWS AND LOCKS!! ICE COLD A/C WITH CLIMATE CONTROL TO ENSURE THE COMFORT OF ALL PASSENGERS!! UPGRADED STERO SYSTEM WITH MP3/AUX/BLUETOOTH CAPABILITIES!! THIS MINT 944 TURBO IS POWERED BY THE 2.5L TURBOCHARGED I4 ENGINE!! LINKED TO A SUPER SMOOTH 5-SPEED MANUAL TRANSMISSION!! KONI SUSPENSION!!THIS CAR IS A JOY TO RIDE!! PICTURES DO NOT DO THIS CAR JUSTICE!! YOU WILL HAVE TO COME CHECK THIS RIDE OUT FOR YOURSELF!! DO NOT MISS YOUR CHANCE TO OWN THE CAR OF YOUR DREAMS!! CALL US TODAY!!
CARFAX CERTIFIED
2.5L TURBOCHARGED I4 FI SOHC – REAR WHEEL DRIVE
BLACK EXTERIOR PAINT – FACTORY SILVER WHEELS – GOODYEAR EAGLE TIRES
BLACK PERFORATED LEATHER INTERIOR – CLIMATE CONTROL – POWER FRONT AND REAR SEATS – REMOVABLE SUNROOF – FULLY LOADED
NEVER WRECKED OR SMOKED IN
FULLY DETAILED AND SERVICED
Rarity:
Of the roughly 16,500 E30 M3s produced, 5,115 were for the U.S. market.
Of the roughly 11,000 B2 Quattros produced, a scant 664 were sold in the U.S..
Of the roughly 25,000 944 Turbos produced, over 14,000 were sold in the U.S..
Okay, so the 944 Turbo loses some points to the others on obscurity. However, that number doesn’t tell the whole story, as nearly 50% of the 944 Turbos sold here were 1986 models, followed by a big chunk of 1987s. Only 3,259 of the 1988/1989 model were sold in the U.S., and of those the ’89s are more rare.
Performance:
U.S. spec M3: $38,000, 192 horsepower, 0-60 6.9 seconds, 1/2 mile 15.2 at 92 mph
U.S. spec Audi Quattro: $40,000, 160 horsepower, 0-60 7.9 seconds, 1/4 mile 16 seconds at 85 mph
U.S. spec Porsche 944 Turbo (S):$48,000, 247 horsepower, 0-60 5.5 seconds, 1/4 mile 13.9 seconds at 101 mph
Okay, performance doesn’t tell the whole picture of these cars. At first glance, the Quattro is at a distinct power disadvantage and was never offered in the much more competitive 20V RR version which would put it on level footing with the M3 and Turbo. Still, the rarity and 4-wheel drive legacy of the Quattro outweigh the performance disadvantage to some extent. The M3’s performance legacy has probably been overstated or overhyped; on paper, the numbers aren’t really very impressive, but the E30 is certainly more than the sum of its parts. But it’s pretty clear that when it came to speed, the 944 Turbo in S form bullied the other two easily.
Was it a successful race car?
M3: Yes, but not by as wide of a margin as everyone would have you believe.
Quattro: Yes, but not as domineering or nearly as successful of one as everyone would have you believe.
944 Turbo: Yes, but not in race series that many have heard of and not as evocatively as the other two.
Does a successful race car make a successful road car? Does that really matter to your everyday experience? Is there actually a link between the curb-hopping Nürburgring and your everyday life? These are questions best individually answered, but at the end of the day, no – there wasn’t much link between the fully-blown DTM/WRC/Cup cars that were built to race and your road version. They share some components, yes, but all were altered substantially to race. The motor in the M3 is widely considered to be closest to the race version of the three, but in actuality the 944 Turbo is likely closer to Cup specs in stock form than the E30 is to a Group A or Group N car. The Quattro is a pretty wide gap from the Group 5 or B rally cars in stock form. All were luxuried-up and softened in road guise.
Does any of this matter? No, I don’t think I told you anything you didn’t already know. You’ve already made up your mind on which is the best, and for the most part I don’t think there are many people cross-shopping these cars. But for argument’s sake, let’s see what value this car represents. Recently, I looked at a 1983 Audi Quattro. Nicer than most that come to the market, it traded for $33,000 – nearly spot on the asking price of this car. On the BMW side, to match the condition and mileage of this 944 Turbo we need to look to Enthusiast Auto Group, where unsurprisingly we find a wide assortment of gorgeous E30 M3s. Similar mileage puts you in a $150,000 asking price range; indeed, you’re not going to find much E30 M3 these days for $30,000.
Condition of this 944 Turbo is great, but a few things stand out. Black over Black is relatively rare as are the lower miles. The finish on the Club Sport wheels appears to be original and slightly faded. There is a non-original radio and the Blaupunkt amplifier is gone, as well as a non-original air intake. Outside of that, this car looks pretty outstanding. Does it represent a better value than the Quattro? Well, in terms of collector value both are currently pretty good bets that you’re not likely to immediately lose your shirt on. The same can’t be said for dropping $150,000 on a M3 – you’re betting there on a market bubble continuing, which there is no evidence it will. Since the poll of candidates is not growing between these three, it’s still a pick-your-passion discussion. But weigh the performance, the driving experience, the build quality and the value for dollar out, and to me, it’s not very hard to argue that among these specific three the 944 Turbo in this scenario is still the best value.
Thanks to our reader Sam for the spot!
-Carter
Nice comparison piece, Carter. I agree that these are a great value at the moment. If I had the cash sitting around, I’d be tempted to sell the E30 convertible and jump on the Porsche bandwagon before its too late. Some day I will have on of these.
Thanks @Mark E!
This looks like a very interesting Porsche. I think the black is metallic versus straight – looks very nice.
As for preference, no question for me the Porsche is the way to go. Value-wise I can’t fathom the M3 going rate these days. The Quattro is such a narrow niche. That being said, I am still having trouble with $30K-plus 944s.
A few thoughts:
-classic air-cooled 911s are dominating the collector Porsche market so it seems they have raised the prices on other P-cars but then again there is a general rise in value on desirable 80s sports/GT cars.
-It is ever more rare to see pristine 944 turbos since these cars were driven hard by their original owners and many of them ended up being converted to racing cars.
http://www.usedcarsfsbo.com/asp/Item.asp?soldid=38189&make=Porsche&theday=10%2F16%2F2011 (same car 6 years ago)
+1 on Mark E’s comment. Great write up Carter! I am not in the market, however, this car looks like a solid “bet”, but I would never buy a car as an investment, I would buy it to drive it. I apologize to this cars apparent collectibility, but I would buy it to drive it and keep it the way it was intended by the manufacturer. And it would be a lot of fun, I’m sure of that. Great find and provocative read!
Thanks, @Early8q! The Turbos can eat up your running budget on some normal repairs (like power steering and air conditioning systems – it’s mega packaged in that engine bay, and they tend to get a bit cooked) but they are supreme fun to drive. I took my father’s ’89 to a few PCA races a couple of years back – they just consume miles very easily and in great comfort, while simultaneously being able to rip your head off pretty much any time you desire it. Learn to live with the lag and they can be easily hustled in any situation, yet will still get nearly 30 mpg on the highway. And they’re beautifully built, too – much higher quality materials in these in 1989 than the pre-85 cars.
While I consider myself an Audi fan through and through, the Quattros of this vintage never really grabbed me – I appreciate / respect them but have no real desire to own one. The M3s are just silly from a price standpoint. An ’89 944 Turbo has long been near the top of my list (dating back to a white over burgundy example that I used to see / covet in NW Wisconsin back ’92/’93), and I think they are an incredible value for the performance the offer (if you want something from this era). With that said, this one doesn’t get me fired up – the black on black looks to be in fine shape (although i’m not sure it is the best color to show off the 944’s curves) and the mileage is about as low as I’ve seen, but the aftermarket radio is a turnoff (makes me wonder about the rest of the machine) and a price >$33k leaves me feeling I may have missed the boat on these. Will be interesting to see if it clears the mkt at that level.